Dorchester legislators have mixed feelings about the new Massachusetts flag and seal design options that have been laid out by a state advisory commission.
After a previous panel failed to select a design in 2023, the current commission sifted through more than 1,150 entries to come up with three finalists for a flag, motto, and seal just before Labor Day, according to State House News Service.
The existing flag and seal features a Native American man standing with a hand holding a sword above his head, and has been deemed offensive to Native Americans by many critics.
The commission narrowed its designs to images depicting a mayflower, the Blue Hills, and turkey feathers as a way to celebrate Massachusetts’ natural history. They plan to have public hearings this fall to make a final decision.
State Sen. Liz Miranda, who represents parts of Dorchester and Roxbury in the Second Suffolk district, favors a change.
“As the Senate Chair of the Joint Committee on Racial Equity, Civil Rights, and Inclusion, I support the creation of a new state flag and the Commission’s thoughtful process in studying and recommending symbols that better reflect the values and diversity of Massachusetts today,” Miranda, a Democrat, wrote in an email.
Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid, of Mattapan, said: “The Massachusetts state flag represents all of us, and I believe the people should have the final say in what it looks like.”
“While I respect the process that brought us to this point, my focus remains on the urgent issues facing our communities — issues such as protecting our seniors, education, public safety and economic opportunity,” said Fluker-Reid. “These are the priorities that directly impact the lives of families in our district.”

Rep. Russell Holmes, who represents parts of Mattapan, Dorchester, and Roslindale, supports a redesign, but doesn’t like any of the three finalists.
“We’ve known it’s been important for indigenous people and Native Americans for years now, and we need to address it,” said Holmes, who added that he wants Native Americans and indigenous people to have an amplified voice in the process.
He said that it has taken the Legislature a long time to address the issue, and the results are not satisfying.
“I also just think that the three designs are not creative enough, ingenious enough, or thoughtful enough,” says Holmes. “I will be concerned if those are our final three.”
Rep. Daniel Hunt, of Dorchester, said he does not have a strong opinion about the current design finalists, but supports the public’s ability to weigh in, which is why he voted to support the creation of the commission, he said.
Hunt does favor keeping the state’s longtime motto, a Latin phrase “Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem,” which translates to “By the sword we seek peace, but peace only under liberty.”
State Sen. Nick Collins and Reps. Christopher Worrell and David Biele did not respond to requests for their comments.
Gov. Healey said in September that she is focused on lowering housing costs, energy bills, and handling issues with ICE, and the flag design is not a priority for her while noting that she supports the legislative effort.
One of her declared Republican opponents in next year’s gubernatorial election, Mike Kenneally, has argued that the state has more pressing issues right now and believes changing the flag would be a legislative nightmare.
Holmes said it shouldn’t be that complicated. “We have been going back and forth on these flag conversations for too many years,” he said, “so I think we need to go on and nip it in the bud.
“So even if there are lots of things happening, I don’t want us to get caught up in the politics of the Republicans asking why we are even changing the flag and why this is important.”





