Tag: property tax

  • Town Meeting approved a property tax relief program for veterans in 2024. Why hasn’t it been launched?

    When Town Meeting unanimously approved a property tax work-off program for veterans in November 2024, co-petitioner Alec Lebovitz said he was excited to spread the word to the community.

    “It provides some much-needed relief to a very small number of residents,” he said, “but residents who need that help and, in this case, have all served our country.”

    Nearly a year and a half later, the program has yet to launch.

    Town Meeting members talk before the start of the meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024 Photo by Brennan Kauffman

    The measure is supposed to offer property tax abatements to veterans and surviving spouses in exchange for part-time service to the town. Participants could volunteer up to 125 hours in town departments such as the library and schools to reduce their property tax bill by up to $1,875 annually. Dozens of municipalities throughout Massachusetts, including Boston and Newton, have adopted similar programs.

    The veteran tax work-off program was to run in tandem with the 35-slot senior tax work-off program that has been running in Brookline since 2009. However, Vivian Williams, the senior tax-work off program coordinator, said she was unaware of this addition. “I don’t know anything about veterans,” she said.

    Town officials and Select Board members were unable to provide a clear reason why no slots for veterans have been added.

    Assistant Town Administrator Charles Young suggested there may have been trouble finding a veteran who would both benefit from the program and be able to provide skills needed by town department roles.

    Town Administrator Chas Carey said his impression is that most veterans in Brookline rent rather than own homes and would therefore not benefit from the program. 

    Town data suggests dozens of veterans own property in Brookline. The most recently available accessors’ data show that 51 veterans and surviving spouses received property tax reductions in 2023. The age demographics of these veterans are unavailable, but roughly 70% of Brookline veterans overall are over age 60, according to U.S. Census data.

    While this means many veterans would also be eligible for the senior tax work-off program, they would be subject to an income cap of $92,650, unlike the veterans program, which does not have a specified income cap. 

    Creating slots for veterans would not only allow younger veterans to participate but also ensure that older veterans in need would have access to the program without having to compete for a spot in the senior tax work-off program, Lebovitz said.

    Some concern was raised during the proposal’s initial discussion about diluting the effectiveness of the senior work-off program by creating competition between seniors and veterans for limited volunteer roles in town departments.

    “I don’t want it to be a situation where we have a waiting list and it’s pitting two groups against one another,” Carey said. 

    In the proposal for the program, former Veterans’ Services director Bill McGroarty estimated three or four younger veterans could benefit. 

    In a later public hearing, McGroarty reported that one older veteran had already reached out to apply before the town had begun marketing the program. This prompted co-petitioners Lebovitz and Neil Gordon to send a letter to the Select Board last November, urging them to create at least one slot in the veterans program for fiscal year 2027.

    “Fully implementing this program has the potential to create a financial lifeline for struggling veteran families in Brookline at a time when the challenges they face are only growing,” they wrote. 

    Difficulty adjusting to civilian life after service, unemployment and medical debt are some of the reasons veterans experience disproportionate financial instability, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs website. 

    Gordon and Lebovitz said they never received a response to the letter, and the budget cycle began this February with no motion on the program.

    While the co-petitioners acknowledged that the number of veterans who would benefit is unclear, Lebovitz said the only way to find out is by launching the program. He said he was surprised Brookline hadn’t already adopted it when he first came across the opt-in law. 

    “Why doesn’t Brookline have this program?” he said. “If it’s a voluntary program that basically costs us nothing and helps individual residents, why wouldn’t we have this?” 

    Elmon Hendrickson, commander of Brookline American Legion Post 11, said that while he doesn’t know of any individual veterans who would benefit from the program, he thinks it could be helpful to younger veterans. 

    “If they don’t have to be a senior citizen to get it, that would be great,” he said. 

    All the program is waiting on is the Select Board, Lebovitz said. “The issue isn’t that we need money set aside in the budget,” he said. “We need the Select Board to actually create those program slots and get the ball rolling.”

  • ‘It’s sticker shock for many …’ Higher property taxes are hitting homeowners hard, advocates say

    Boston senior citizens who have owned their homes for decades are being hit hard by the higher property taxes that went into effect at the start of the year, said Michael Kozu, co-director of Project R.I.G.H.T., a collaboration of residents in Grove Hall.

    Kozu, a longtime Grove Hall advocate, said he has been getting complaints from senior homeowners about the increase. With food and utility prices soaring, Kozu said elderly homeowners, particularly those on fixed incomes, are “house rich but cash poor,” a problem exacerbated by the property tax hike.

    “They have to make these hard decisions about where that money comes from,” said Kozu in a recent interview. “Does it come from their food budget, or are they scrambling to pay gas bills or utility bills? Heating bills are more expensive this winter because it has been awfully cold.”

    The Boston City Council voted in December to set the property tax rates at 13%, which means an extra $780 for the average single-family homeowner.

    Mayor Michelle Wu, citing housing as a huge cost for residents, had sought state legislation that aimed to provide relief for Boston homeowners by temporarily shifting more of the tax burden to commercial properties. The measure was blocked in the Senate. Wu refilled the legislation, which the Senate passed in January. It is now awaiting a review in the House.

    City Councilor Miniard Culpepper, who represents District 7, urged city and state officials to work in “partnership to develop solutions that support our residents in both the short term and long term.”

    Culpepper, in an email, said his constituents have been expressing concerns about their higher tax bills, adding that it is causing real dread among residents who fear being pushed out of homes they have lived in for decades — homes they worked hard to purchase and maintain, he added.

    “Residents are reaching out because they are feeling the impact, and many are worried about how they will manage [the] rising costs,’’ Culpepper added. “People are genuinely concerned and are looking for clarity, relief options, and long-term solutions. It’s clear that this is creating real stress for homeowners across the district.”

    Fatima Ali-Salaam, president of the Greater Mattapan Neighborhood Council, said that it’s unfair that some landlords of small properties will pay less in taxes than longtime owners of single-family homes.

    She said that she has advised members of her group recently on how to seek greater relief from the city. She said she and her husband work and will not be as impacted by the higher prices as others.

    “It’s sticker shock for many, especially if you are a retired person and you haven’t made great changes to your home for decades,’’ she added.

    Chris Lehman, a board member of the Small Property Owner Association, said the mayor’s proposal would hurt landlords and owners of commercial properties.

    He said landlords, who typically pass on increased costs to their tenants, are already reeling from higher property taxes from the past two years and other operating costs. Some have said they might sell and leave the city because it won’t be worth it for them to stay here, he added.

    “It’s unfortunate that the tax rate has increased,” said Lehman, “and it’s similarly unfortunate how aggressive the city’s assessing practices have been.”

    The city should be more “disciplined” in its spending, Lehman added.

    This story originally appeared on flipsidenews.net.