Tag: Tori Torres

  • Antisemitism Commission recommendations bring concerns about free speech

    Some in Newton are questioning whether recommendations to fight antisemitism in schools across Massachusetts protect students or threaten free speech rights.

    The Massachusetts Legislature’s Special Commission on Antisemitism, which includes Newton Mayor Ruthanne Fuller, approved recommendations to combat antisemitism in schools across the state on Aug. 8. The panel was established after a rise in antisemitic hate crimes in the commonwealth last year.

    Newton Democratic Rep. Greg Schwartz said in an interview that he supports the commission’s recommendations for enhanced educational programming about the history of antisemitism and is confident the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will provide clear guidance on how to approach the subject thoughtfully and fairly.

    Schwartz said most feedback from community members has been favorable, but some are concerned that focusing on antisemitism is unfair to other groups who have suffered discrimination and may lead to limitations on free speech.

    “The commission’s makeup is extremely biased to contain only one view of the matter–it doesn’t even represent the full spectrum of opinions within the Jewish community itself,” said Noam Shoresh, an Israeli Jewish resident of Newton for more than 20 years.

    Shoresh has two sons who attended Newton North High School and said that neither of them hid the fact they are Jewish or Israeli, and that they have not felt any “animosity” directed towards them because of their background.

    Shoresh said he fears the recommendations will only do harm. Growing up in Israel, he wasn’t taught the Palestinian perspective regarding the foundation of Israel in school.

    “I don’t want this to be true for my children or anyone else in Newton, but this is precisely where the commission’s recommendations lead,” said Shoresh. “Its agenda from the outset was to protect Israel’s reputation and to wage war against Israel’s critics, and the recommendations do exactly that, at the direct expense of freedom of speech, and at the cost of giving our students the proper access to information and discussions from which they could learn and grow.”

    At a Palestinian-solidarity encampment at MIT last spring, Shoresh said that he felt no hostility after he presented himself as an Israeli Jew. He said that people were happy to engage in conversation and answer questions about their views.

    “I do not want to imply by this that antisemitic incidents never occur, nor to belittle the experience of students who feel threatened by them,” said Shoresh. “At the same time, when people in the Jewish Israeli community in Newton talk about ‘our children are under attack,’ it does not resonate at all with my own experience.”

    However, Nanette Fridman, a Waban resident, said in a Facebook message that she strongly supports the recommendations and is grateful to Gov. Maura Healey for establishing the commission. She said that Newton’s decades-long history of antisemitic incidents and biased curricula in schools have caused Jewish students and families to feel unseen or unsafe.

    “Addressing this history honestly and constructively is essential to building a more inclusive future. Newton can and should be a model for doing this right,” Fridman said.

    Fridman said a statewide bias reporting system, antisemitism education and training for students and staff, and ensuring access to kosher and halal food in schools are some of the key recommendations outlined in the commission’s guidelines.

    “To make them real, they must be funded, monitored and updated regularly,” Fridman said. “Without sustained involvement and oversight, this effort risks becoming an academic exercise rather than a lived reality.”

    Fridman suggested that a “biennial review process” should be implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of the recommendations, and update them as needed.

    Mosaic: Interfaith Youth Action, a nonprofit organization dedicated to connecting middle and high school youth across different faith identities from across Greater Boston, was cited as an example in one of the commission’s recommendations: “Schools should promote and invest in after-school programs and clubs that encourage cross-identity or cross-communal bonding through shared experiences.”

    Mosaic’s co-president Runa Islam said in an interview that she wasn’t sure how the commission became aware of their organization, but believes that this specific recommendation will create more opportunities for young people of all identities and strengthen communities across Massachusetts.

    “It is clear that many of us in Newton are feeling deep pain about different aspects of this war, and that is leading to miscommunication and lack of basic human empathy on all sides,” said Islam. “It’s especially painful for me to see neighbors and friends turn on one another–and for the youth of our communities to see that behavior modeled and normalized.”

    Mayor Ruthanne Fuller did not reply for comment after multiple attempts of contact.

    *****

    This story is part of a partnership between the Newton Beacon and the Boston University Department of Journalism.

  • Amid federal cuts, legislators push for transition to clean energy

    State legislators and Newton officials are encouraging residents to participate in sustainability programs to reach the commonwealth’s goal of net-zero emissions by 2050, following recent federal funding cuts to clean energy projects.

    On Oct. 2, the Trump administration terminated federal funding for 223 energy projects nationwide, totaling $7.5 billion nationally and approximately $446 million in Massachusetts. In a press release, Gov. Maura Healey said that the cuts target private companies, universities and nonprofits working on research and product development, and undermine efforts to lower energy prices.

    “These misguided actions will make it significantly harder to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 in Massachusetts,” Sen. Cynthia Creem said in an interview. “We cannot completely fill the gaps from the lost federal funding, but we are not powerless.”

    The Newton Democrat advised that the best way forward is to continue pursuing climate policies and installing clean energy at the state and local level. She noted the state will continue to offer programs that fund clean energy investments, including Mass Save for energy efficiency and electrification, MOR-EV for electric vehicle incentives, and initiatives supporting solar and battery storage systems.

    Creem said she has personally filed bills to ensure that scarce climate resources are used as effectively as possible. These include establishing a process for low-cost transition from gas to clean heat, transforming Mass Save’s energy assessments into decarbonization assessments, and aligning transportation infrastructure with climate obligations.

    “Massachusetts law requires us to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 and that hasn’t changed. If we’re going to comply with that law, then we don’t have time to despair. We have to get to work,” said Creem.

    Ann Berwick, co-director of the Newton Sustainability Department, said that Newton is moving ahead with programs that aren’t federally funded.

    One example is the Building Emissions Reduction and Disclosure Ordinance (BERDO), which targets reducing the carbon footprint of large buildings in Newton, which account for 27% of the city’s greenhouse gas emissions. Berwick also highlighted Newton Power Choice—which is funded by electricity customers and utility bills—as a resource for residents to increase their investment in clean energy.

    Green Newton, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving sustainability and educating residents on their resource use, hosted a Green Expo on Sunday to highlight environmentally friendly products, companies and information.

    “We are killing our planet with greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels. We have to stop doing that,” said Craig Forman, a member of Green Newton’s board of directors.

    Forman said that while federal tax credits are being lost, there are still other easy ways for Newton residents to make a difference locally. Eating less beef and taking public transportation, walking or biking can help lessen greenhouse gas emissions.

    “These can have a very big effect, even though it’s not putting equipment in your house or any big change of lifestyle,” said Forman.

    *****

    This story is part of a partnership between the Newton Beacon and the Boston University Department of Journalism.

  • Sangiolo, Schwartz weigh in on legislature audit fight

    As the political stalemate over implementation of a voter-approved ballot question to audit the Legislature continues, Massachusetts Auditor Diana DiZoglio is calling on Attorney General Andrea Campbell to go to court over alleged missing documents needed to implement the controversial law.

    DiZoglio argued that the attorney general’s office originally deemed the audit constitutional when it appeared on the ballot in the November 2024 election, but Campbell later retracted that position based on her relationships with “top lawmakers.”

    Campbell approved the question based on separate constitutional requirements related to initiative petitions. But in making that decision in 2023, Campbell issued a lengthy legal opinion that the auditor did not have the authority to audit another branch of government.

    “I’m happy, once again, to meet everybody in court and give them everything they need to be able to do their job,” said DiZoglio. “But the gaslighting and scapegoating by these people of the general public needs to stop.”

    The ballot measure, also known as Question 1, passed with 72% statewide approval and 65% support among Newton voters. It gave the auditor the authority to audit the Legislature. Campbell issued statements declaring that the auditor’s office has not provided enough documentation to move forward with implementation.

    “They’re going to drag this out into eternity in the hopes that you all forget that you voted for this, and they are grossly underestimating the people of Massachusetts,” said DiZoglio.

    Newton Democratic Reps. Amy Sangiolo and Greg Schwartz both said they support transparency but they also value a clear separation of powers.

    Schwartz said he supported the new joint committee rules that were approved in the spring for the House and Senate.

    “Newton voters are especially engaged in the political process, so I believe the improvements in committee transparency created in the new rules are going to help my constituents,” said Schwartz.

    Historically, the Legislature has been audited by an outside, independent firm, which can later be reviewed by the state auditor for accuracy, said Schwartz. He emphasized that “the separation of powers doctrine protects the independence of the three branches of government from encroachment by one another.”

    Sangiolo said she interpreted the 2024 results on Question 1 as a clear indication that Massachusetts residents want more transparency and accountability from the Legislature.

    “I believe the House has been responding appropriately to Question 1, revising its rules to open the legislative process and also giving the auditor the authority to hire an outside firm to conduct a financial audit of the House,” said Sangiolo.

    Sangiolo added that she would like to know what specific information Newton voters are looking for outside what is covered in the joint committee rules.

    “I support a financial and professional audit, not a political one,” she said. After the ballot measure passed in November 2024, House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka rejected DiZoglio’s audit, calling it “unconstitutional” and “unnecessary.”

    If the audit is implemented, Lawrence Friedman, a professor at New England School of Law, said in an interview that he worries it will “run the risk of interfering with and potentially undermining the Legislature’s proper functioning under the state Constitution.”

    Friedman said John Adams and other framers of the Massachusetts Constitution separated the three branches of government “to ensure that each department respects the constitutional responsibilities of the others.”

    Act on Mass, a nonprofit organization dedicated to transparency, accountability and citizen empowerment in the Legislature, supports DiZoglio’s efforts to implement the audit.

    “We have an uncommonly nontransparent Legislature that has been really effective at consolidating power and shredding some of the checks and balances that were in place,” Scotia Hille, executive director of Act on Mass, said in an interview.

    On whether the audit is constitutional, Hille said the only body that can rule is the Supreme Judicial Court.

    “I think if they [Mariano and Spilka] are so confident that it is unconstitutional, I would love to see the question go to court, and the auditor has been trying to get court access,” Hille said.

    With the support of organizations like Act on Mass, DiZoglio has continued her push for increased transparency.

    “The people of Massachusetts are fighting back,” DiZoglio said.

    *****

    This story is part of a partnership between the Newton Beacon and the Boston University Department of Journalism.